Work & case studies
From an RFQ inbox to an engineer-ready pack.
Organize a customer request, extract source-backed requirements and surface the questions an engineer must resolve.
Illustrative capabilities to assess and scope together. These are not claims of completed client work or guaranteed commercial results.
01Manufacturing · RFQ preparation · Synthetic workflow demoFrom an RFQ inbox to an engineer-ready pack.
Organize a customer request, extract source-backed requirements and surface the questions an engineer must resolve.
The work that gets stuck
Drawings, emails and specifications arrive as separate revisions. Sales chases an answer before engineering knows which requirements are still uncertain.
Who it is for
Technical sales, application engineering, purchasing and document control.
What goes in
- Permitted RFQ email, drawings and specification revisions
- Product capability records and the team’s review template
What comes out
- A requirement matrix with source references
- Missing-information questions and a quote-preparation pack
- 01System
Assemble the RFQ
Keep the email and drawing revision together.
- Input
- RFQ-104; drawing r3; quantity 200
- Output
- One pack with stable document references.
- 02AI
Extract requirements
Separate explicit facts from missing requirements.
- Input
- Drawing: 2 mm steel; coating not stated
- Output
- Material and thickness captured; coating marked open.
- 03Human
Check feasibility
An engineer resolves ambiguity and capability fit.
- Input
- Requirement matrix + approved capability sheet
- Output
- Engineer accepts material; asks for coating specification.
- 04AI
Prepare the response pack
Draft focused questions and the internal quote worksheet.
- Input
- Open coating field; quantity 200
- Output
- Question draft + worksheet; price and lead time left blank.
- 05Human
Release the reviewed response
Sales approves customer wording and commercial details.
- Input
- Engineer-reviewed pack + commercial decision
- Output
- Approved response ready for the agreed sending path.
Where a person decides
An engineer confirms feasibility, tolerances and standards. A commercial owner approves prices, lead times and the final offer.
When the workflow pauses
Conflicting revisions or an unreadable tolerance stop that item. The workflow marks the source gap rather than inventing a technical value.
What a pilot must prove
- Every extracted requirement links to its source and revision.
- Conflicts and missing values are visible to the engineer.
- No price, compliance claim or delivery date is invented.
What your team receives
- RFQ intake and requirement schema
- Source-linking rules and engineering review checklist
- Reusable Skill, exception queue and handover template
Work & case studies
See the work move.
Six concrete starting points. Follow the source, the decision and the handover your team would own.
One product source. Several local markets.
Turn approved product information into market-specific listing drafts, then publish through an agreed account workflow.
Explore the workflow
A measured advertising adjustment loop.
Turn an agreed monitoring window into evidence, a proposed change and a reviewed result.
Explore the workflow
Make AI access something IT can manage.
Bring company-owned seats, approved APIs, usage and operating procedures into one accountable setup.
Explore the workflow↗ Discuss a project
Which workflow deserves a closer look?
Discuss your workflowThese pages are available in six languages. Project communication and delivery are in English.